Publication Incentives Increase Plagiarism Illustration |
Who would have thought that publication incentives, which are supposed to enhance research, have instead become a major source of plagiarism cases? DuBois et al. (2013) tell that financial incentives correlated with plagiarism. Based on the study by DuBois et al. (2013), 70% of research misconduct is associated with government funding, while 30% is linked to private funding.
According to Curno (2016), incentives can influence author behavior, and the internet may facilitate research misconduct. Research incentives include not only funding but also credit points that contribute to academic advancement. Publication incentives are also linked to the number of publications, which may increase the practice of salami plagiarism.
Publication incentives should be directed toward the impact factor, not merely the number of published journals. This approach could help reduce the practice of salami plagiarism.
References:
DuBois, J. M., Anderson, E. E., Chibnall, J., Carroll, K., Gibb, T., Ogbuka, C., & Rubbelke, T. (2013). Understanding Research Misconduct: A Comparative Analysis of 120 Cases of Professional Wrongdoing. Accountability in Research, 20(5–6), 320–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2013.822248
Curno, M. (2016). Challenges to ethical publishing in the digital era. J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc., 14, 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-08-2015-0026.
Comments
Post a Comment